Alex is Sprintlaw’s co-founder and principal lawyer. Alex previously worked at a top-tier firm as a lawyer specialising in technology and media contracts, and founded a digital agency which he sold in 2015.
- What Is A Scheme Of Arrangement?
- When Would A Small Company Use One?
How The Process Works Step By Step
- 1) Early Planning, Term Sheet And Board Approval
- 2) Class Analysis And Drafting The Scheme
- 3) First Court Hearing (The Convening Hearing)
- 4) Notifying Stakeholders And Providing Information
- 5) Scheme Meetings And Voting Thresholds
- 6) Second Court Hearing (The Sanction Hearing)
- 7) Filing And Implementation
- Key Timing And Cost Considerations
- Key Takeaways
If your company needs to restructure debts, tidy up its share capital, or complete a takeover or merger in a clean, court‑approved way, you’ll likely come across the “scheme of arrangement”.
It sounds technical (and it is), but don’t stress - with the right plan and advice, a scheme can be a flexible, powerful tool for small and growing companies, not just the listed giants.
In this guide, we break down what a scheme of arrangement is under UK law, when a small company might use one, how the process runs step by step, the key requirements to meet, and the documents and governance you’ll need so you’re protected from day one.
What Is A Scheme Of Arrangement?
A scheme of arrangement is a court‑supervised compromise or arrangement between a company and its creditors and/or shareholders under Part 26 of the Companies Act 2006. In simple terms, it’s a legal mechanism that lets you bind a whole class of creditors or members to a deal - provided the required majorities vote in favour and the court sanctions it.
Think of it as a formal, structured way to reorganise obligations or ownership where informal agreements would be messy or impossible. Because it’s sanctioned by the court, a scheme has teeth: once approved, it binds all parties in each affected class, including those who voted against it or didn’t vote.
Common uses include:
- Restructuring financial liabilities (e.g., extending maturities, reducing or swapping debt).
- Tidying up share capital (e.g., cancelling, consolidating or reclassifying shares in a solvent reorganisation).
- Executing friendly takeovers or mergers (a “transfer scheme” to acquire 100% of shares, or a “cancellation scheme” to cancel existing shares and issue new ones to the bidder).
- Resolving legacy disputes or contingent claims with a defined, binding compromise across a creditor group.
Schemes sit alongside other tools (like CVAs and restructuring plans). The key differences are the court’s supervisory role, the classification and voting by classes of creditors/members, and the flexibility to tailor the proposal to your situation.
When Would A Small Company Use One?
You don’t need to be a PLC to use a scheme. Many owner‑managed and venture‑backed companies consider a scheme when they need a predictable, binding outcome that covers everyone in a class.
Typical scenarios include:
- Debt tidy‑up before fundraising or sale. You’re raising capital or selling the business but legacy notes or shareholder loans need to be compromised or converted on uniform terms.
- Clean 100% change of control. A buyer wants all the shares, not just a majority. A takeover scheme can deliver “squeeze‑out” certainty via a single court‑approved process instead of relying on statutory squeeze‑out thresholds under the Takeover Code.
- Solvent reorganisation. You want to simplify your capital structure (for example, cancel deferred shares and create one ordinary class) to prepare for investment or an exit.
- Creditor compromise with holdouts. Most lenders or trade creditors are supportive but a small minority refuse to sign up - a scheme can bind the whole class if majorities support it and the court agrees it’s fair.
Is a scheme always the best route? Not necessarily. For simpler scenarios (like returning surplus cash to shareholders or acquiring a small minority stake), a share buy‑back or a straightforward share transfer might be quicker and cheaper. We cover alternatives below so you can weigh your options.
How The Process Works Step By Step
Every scheme is bespoke, but the typical roadmap looks like this:
1) Early Planning, Term Sheet And Board Approval
You’ll usually start with heads of terms on the commercial deal, initial engagement with key creditors or shareholders, and legal/financial advice on feasibility. Your board should approve proceeding to a scheme in principle and appoint advisers. Make sure board decisions are properly recorded - clear Board Resolutions help show good governance if the court later asks how you made decisions.
2) Class Analysis And Drafting The Scheme
Your lawyers will analyse “classes” - groups of creditors or members whose rights are sufficiently similar to consult together. Get this right: incorrect classing can derail the process. You’ll also draft the scheme document and an explanatory statement explaining the effect of the scheme, why it’s proposed, and alternatives.
3) First Court Hearing (The Convening Hearing)
You apply to court for directions to convene meetings of each affected class. The court won’t decide the merits yet; it checks that the proposed classes look sensible and that the documents give stakeholders enough information to make an informed choice. If satisfied, the court orders the meetings and sets deadlines for notice and proxies.
4) Notifying Stakeholders And Providing Information
You must send the court‑approved notice, the scheme and explanatory statement to everyone in each class (and file materials as directed). Transparency matters. The information needs to be fair, accurate and not misleading so creditors/members can assess the proposal.
5) Scheme Meetings And Voting Thresholds
Each class meets separately and votes. For a scheme to pass in a class, the statutory thresholds are:
- A majority in number (more than 50% by headcount) of those voting in the class; and
- At least 75% in value (by the amount owed or shareholding) of votes cast in the class.
These are not the same as an ordinary or special resolution under the Companies Act - they’re specific scheme thresholds. You’ll need careful voting procedures, scrutineers and records to evidence the results.
6) Second Court Hearing (The Sanction Hearing)
If the classes approve, you return to court to seek sanction. Now the court considers fairness: were the classes fairly represented? Was the voting majority acting bona fide? Is the scheme a fair arrangement that an intelligent and honest stakeholder might reasonably approve? The court won’t re‑run the commercial merits, but it will test process and fairness closely.
7) Filing And Implementation
Once sanctioned, the court order must be delivered to Companies House for the scheme to become effective. Implementation then follows the mechanics in the scheme (e.g., debt exchanges, share cancellations, new share issues, cash payments, and any follow‑on Deed of Novation to move contracts where required by counterparties).
Key Timing And Cost Considerations
- Timeline: Even a streamlined scheme usually takes 8–12 weeks from kick‑off to effective date. Build in buffer for drafting, court availability and stakeholder engagement.
- Cost: Court applications, meeting logistics and professional fees mean schemes carry a cost. Early scoping of alternatives (below) helps ensure the scheme route stacks up on value.
- Disclosure: Expect to provide robust information; inadequate disclosure is a common pitfall.
Alternatives To Consider
Before you lock in a scheme, it’s wise to consider other tools that might achieve your outcome more simply or cheaply.
Restructuring Plan (Part 26A)
Introduced by the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020, the Part 26A restructuring plan is a close cousin of a scheme but with a major extra: “cross‑class cram‑down.” If certain conditions are met, the court can sanction a plan even if a class votes it down. This can be useful where holdouts in a junior class block a value‑preserving deal - but plans typically involve more contested valuation evidence and can be costlier.
Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA)
A CVA is an insolvency process under the Insolvency Act 1986 overseen by an insolvency practitioner, typically used for trading compromises (e.g., rent, trade creditors). It’s cheaper than a scheme and doesn’t require court sanction upfront, but it’s less flexible for share capital reorganisations or takeovers.
Share Buy‑Back Or Capital Reduction
If your goal is to return cash to shareholders or clean up legacy share classes, a properly documented share buy‑back or a capital reduction (by solvency statement or court) may be enough. These routes can be quicker, provided your Articles of Association allow it and you follow the statutory process.
Share Transfer Or Business Sale
For simple changes of ownership, a negotiated Share Sale Agreement and completion mechanics may suffice. If only some shareholders are selling, individual share transfers can achieve the outcome without involving the court.
Contractual Consents And Novations
If the driver is to move key contracts into a new structure, sometimes targeted consent and a Deed of Novation will get you there without a full scheme - assuming counterparties cooperate.
Documents, Governance And Compliance Essentials
Even though a scheme is court‑supervised, your company still needs strong internal governance and properly drafted documents. Here’s what we typically see in place.
Corporate Governance And Resolutions
- Board approvals: Minutes or Board Resolutions approving the proposal, the scheme documents, and any applications to court.
- Member approvals: Depending on the mechanics, you may also need company resolutions (for example, to amend the Articles, approve share issues, or authorise buy‑backs). Knowing when to use an ordinary vs special resolution matters.
- Articles alignment: Ensure your Articles of Association and any investor rights are consistent with the scheme timetable (e.g., pre‑emption waivers for new issues, drag/cancel mechanics in a cancellation scheme).
Key Transaction Documents
- Scheme document and explanatory statement: The backbone of the process, explaining terms, effects and alternatives. Accuracy and clarity are critical.
- Implementation agreements: Depending on the deal, you may need subscription documents, new debt instruments, intercreditor updates or completion mechanics for an acquisition.
- Shareholder arrangements: After the scheme, updated governance might be required (e.g., a refreshed Shareholders Agreement if the cap table changes).
Disclosure And Fairness
The court expects stakeholders to have the information they reasonably need to decide. This normally includes:
- Clear explanation of how the scheme affects rights, who’s in each class and why.
- Financial impact and comparison with likely alternatives.
- Any material interests of directors or connected parties in the scheme.
- Voting procedures, deadlines and how to appoint proxies.
Skimping on disclosure is one of the fastest ways to jeopardise court sanction. Build time for review and Q&A.
Stakeholder Engagement Strategy
Winning hearts and minds matters. Early, honest engagement with key creditors or investors often decides whether a scheme succeeds. Consider a sounding exercise (where appropriate) before the convening hearing so you understand concerns and can adjust terms or provide clarifications in the explanatory statement.
Regulatory And Technical Touchpoints
- Companies House filings: You’ll need to file the court order for the scheme to take effect, plus any follow‑on filings (e.g., share capital changes).
- Financial services and tax: Certain instruments or debt‑for‑equity swaps carry tax implications. Factor in HMRC and accounting impacts early.
- Investor consents: Check any consents under existing instruments, investor side letters or financing documents - your Shareholders Agreement may contain consent thresholds or vetoes to address before launch.
Common Pitfalls (And How To Avoid Them)
- Mis‑classing stakeholders: If rights aren’t sufficiently similar, they shouldn’t be in the same class. Get expert input on class analysis.
- Inadequate disclosure: Courts take a dim view of missing or optimistic information. Treat the explanatory statement like a prospectus in tone and rigour.
- Rushing the timetable: Build in time for queries and adjournments. A smooth scheme is a well‑planned scheme.
- Forgetting post‑completion housekeeping: Update registers, issue certificates, file returns and align your corporate documents promptly.
How Schemes Interact With Your Existing Company Documents
A scheme can change who owns or is owed what. Make sure your core company documents won’t trip you up on the way through:
- Confirm your Articles of Association allow the necessary share actions and that any required waivers (pre‑emption, transfer restrictions) are secured in time.
- Check voting thresholds and veto rights in your Shareholders Agreement so you can meet internal approvals without last‑minute surprises.
- Prepare any ancillary share transfers or buy‑backs if the scheme mechanics require them for tidying residual positions.
Not sure whether you need a company approval, a scheme class vote or both? It’s a common question. As a rule of thumb, the scheme governs creditor/member approval for the arrangement itself, but corporate actions (like altering share capital) may still require company resolutions under the Companies Act (often by ordinary or special resolution).
Key Takeaways
- A scheme of arrangement is a court‑supervised compromise under Part 26 of the Companies Act 2006 that can bind all creditors or members in a class if the required majorities vote in favour and the court sanctions it.
- Schemes are useful for small companies when you need a binding, clean outcome - for debt restructures, solvent share capital reorganisations, or delivering 100% ownership in a friendly takeover.
- The process has two court hearings, class meetings with dual thresholds (majority in number and 75% in value), and strict disclosure expectations. Build a clear plan, realistic timeline and robust records.
- Always test alternatives: restructuring plans (with cram‑down), CVAs, share buy‑backs, share sales or targeted novations may achieve the same goal more simply.
- Strong governance and documents matter. Align your Articles of Association, get the right Board Resolutions in place, and ensure any Shareholders Agreement consents are addressed early.
- Schemes are technical - tailored legal advice will help you get the classing, disclosure and approvals right the first time and avoid costly delays.
If you’re weighing up a scheme of arrangement (or an alternative) for your company, we can help you map the options and handle the documents and court steps end‑to‑end. You can reach us at 08081347754 or team@sprintlaw.co.uk for a free, no‑obligations chat.


